Furious residents in the affluent Southbourne area of Bournemouth are expressing outrage over a developer’s proposal that threatens to obstruct their sea views. The developer, Eddie Fitzsimmons of Vivir Estates, had initially assured residents that some green space would be preserved during the construction of 27 luxury flats. However, the developer is now facing criticism for seeking new permission to construct a two-storey detached house on the designated land, contrary to his earlier commitments.
Local resident Liz Bates, among others who have lost their sea views due to the development, has condemned the developer for reneging on promises made to the community. Bates highlighted that the proposed additional dwelling contradicts the initial plans, which indicated that the existing vegetation would remain untouched. She described the developer’s actions as deceitful and detrimental to the well-being of approximately 100 residents who have been affected by the loss of the only green space allocated for the development.
The potential two-storey house, if approved, would feature a roof terrace with unimpeded coastal views, a privilege that many residents no longer enjoy due to the ongoing construction. Concerns have been raised by residents who fear further infringement on their views and privacy if the new plans are given the green light.
In response to the proposed development, residents like Ian Smith and Kathryn Samson have voiced their discontent, emphasizing the impact on neighboring properties and questioning the council’s consideration for the local community. Smith criticized the developer for seeking to maximize profits by disregarding the initial agreement to maintain green space, suggesting that affected parties may pursue legal action for compensation.
Moreover, the developer’s actions have stirred controversy in the community, as highlighted by the construction of an unauthorized privacy wall that obstructed sea views for residents like Bates. Despite the council’s refusal of retrospective planning permission for the wall, Vivir Estates has appealed the decision in a bid to retain it. Additionally, the developer’s representatives have argued that the proposed house would enhance the area’s aesthetics and alleviate the local housing shortage.
The ongoing dispute between residents and the developer has led to tensions within the community, with concerns raised about the prioritization of commercial interests over the well-being of residents. The Mirror has reached out to Vivir Estates for their comments on the matter.